Syria’s strategic choice: Standing with or against Iran’s regional ambitions

From the report

The question of whether Syria should support Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and other Gulf states amid escalating regional tensions is about far more than diplomatic alignment. It concerns the future balance of power in the Middle East, the sovereignty of regional nations, and Syria’s own security interests. Given Iran’s longstanding interventionist policies and its extensive network of armed proxies, Syrian solidarity with the Gulf would be both understandable and strategically significant.

For decades, Iran has relied on foreign armed groups to advance its regional ambitions. Lebanese Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, Afghan and Pakistani fighters, and Yemen’s Houthi movement have all played roles in Tehran’s broader strategy. Through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran has provided military advisers, weapons, training, and operational support to these groups, transforming local conflicts into interconnected arenas of regional confrontation.

Yemen illustrates this strategy particularly clearly. What initially appeared to be an internal struggle has evolved into a regional security crisis, with the Houthis serving as a central instrument of Iranian influence. Their military activities have threatened Saudi Arabia, disrupted regional stability, and exposed the vulnerability of critical maritime routes. Iran’s involvement demonstrates how Tehran can project power beyond its borders without necessarily engaging in conventional warfare.